Thursday, July 30, 2026

My Philly Daily & Broad + Liberty On Crime Column: Looking Forward To The New James Bond Film

Philly Daily & Broad + Liberty ran my On Crime column today on the upcoming James Bond film.

You can read the column via the link below or the following text

 Paul Davis: Looking forward to the new James Bond film

As fans eagerly await the next 007 film, they wonder what actor will assume the role of Bond, James Bond.

As a James Bond film fan and Ian Fleming aficionado, I too am waiting for the new film. I’ve been a Bond film fan since I first saw Sean Connery as Bond in Dr. No when I was a kid in the early 1960s. After viewing the second Bond film, From Russia With Love, I bought the Ian Fleming novels, which I was pleased to discover were darker and more complicated than the films.

I hope the new Bond film will be more faithful to Ian Fleming’s classic novels, and I hope the producers will pick a good actor to portray Bond.

Amazon acquired control of the world-popular, billion dollar 64-year-long James Bond franchise last year from the original producer Albert “Cubby” Broccoli’s daughter, Barbara Broccoli, and his stepson, Michael G. Wilson.

Amazon MGM Studios and Broccoli and Wilson formed a new joint venture in which they will co-own James Bond intellectual property rights, but Amazon MGM will have total creative control. Financial terms weren't disclosed, but it was big, big bucks.

The deal has increased speculation, and British bookie’s bets, about who will portray the world’s most famous fictional secret agent and international crime fighter in a new film that is set to hit the big screen in 2028.  

That will be seven years after the last Bond film, No Time to Die (it ought to have been called No Time To Think of a Better Title), which featured Daniel Craig’s last portrayal of James Bond. 

The new film is being produced by David Heyman and Amy Pascal, and Denis Villeneuve, the director of Dune and Blade Runner 2049, is set to direct. Steven Knight, the creator of Peaky Blinders, is writing the screenplay. But the new James Bond actor has not yet been selected, or perhaps not yet announced. 

Experienced and fairly well-known actors such as Callum Turner, 36, and Aaron Taylor-Johnson, 36, are being named by the press (and British bookies) as possibly the new Bond, but I suspect it will be a younger actor (Sean Connery, the first cinema Bond - and still the best in my view - was 32 when he filmed Dr. No), as well as a lesser-known and more rugged actor.

I believe they will select a younger actor as the film makers would like the new actor to do a 15-year run or more as James Bond. I also suspect they want a more rugged and physical actor, harking back to the ruggedly handsome Sean Connery, whom Ian Fleming first dismissed but later told a friend that the Scot actor looked like his Bond and had the right physique, and the rough-hewn, mug faced Daniel Craig. Movie audiences believed the two actors would kill without hesitation. I think the film makers will shy away from actors who, like Roger Moore and Pierce Brosnan, are traditionally handsome and less intimidating.

There is also intense debate on what direction the new film will take, as Daniel Craig’s Bond character was killed in No Time To Die (apparently there was, in fact, time to die). 

One speculated direction that I would like the film makers to take is to reboot the series by having the film set in the 1950s, the era in which author Ian Fleming first set his Bond character.

I would also like the film makers to be more faithful to Fleming’s popular novels. And I would like the film makers to remake some of the sillier, action-comedies in the film canon, beginning with Sean Connery’s Diamonds Are Forever (1971) and all of Roger Moore’s Bond films from 1973 to 1985. 

As a teenager in the 1960s I loved Roger Moore as Simon Templar in the TV series, The Saint. He was debonair, tough and cool. I wish Moore had portrayed Bond as tough and less comedic like Simon Templar.

I’d like to see a remake of Moonraker as a true thriller set in the post-WWII 1950s. The Moore film was silly, taking its cue from Star Wars. Fleming’s Moonraker novel was much darker. It had a great plot and a great villain, and it would make a great film.

Likewise, Diamonds Are Forever. Connery’s film was made as an action-comedy rather than a thriller. The film was amusing and well-made (as were Moore’s Bond films) but if one reads the Fleming novel, I suspect one will wish for a more faithful film version.


In the novel Diamonds Are Forever, Bond takes on the American mob and is much more realistic than the 1971 film. Anyone who reads the novel won’t soon forget the spa violence at the Saratoga Racetrack. There are many other unforgettable set pieces in the novel as well.

So, like millions of other Bond film fans, I eagerly await the arrival of the new Bond, James Bond.

Paul Davis’s On Crime column appears here each week. He is also a contributor to Broad + Liberty and Counterterrorism magazine. He can be reached via pauldavisoncrime.com 

Tuesday, July 28, 2026

Cinema Crime Wave: A Look Back At The Great Crime Films

 I recently passed by the street in South Philadelphia where the Colonial movie theater used to sit. The old movie house was torn down some years ago and an apartment complex now sits on the site.

I spent many hours of my childhood in the 1950s and 60s in that theater. I saw Dr No and the other Sean Connery-James Bond movies there. I saw John Wayne in The Alamo there. I also saw a good number of crime films there.

In the 1960s and 70s, a block away from the Colonial, was a Cheesesteak sandwich shop that didn’t sell cheesesteaks or anything else. The store was a well-known front for the headquarters of a Cosa Nostra capo named Frank Sindone, who oversaw all loan sharking in Philadelphia and South Jersey.

While moviegoers enjoyed crime films in a darkened theater on 11th Street, the true-life criminals were meeting just down the block on 10th Street.

Although the vast majority of South Philadelphians were and are honest, hard-working and law-abiding people, such as my parents, South Philly was and is the hub of organized crime in the Philadelphia area. As an aspiring writer, I grew up in South Philly with an interest in both reel and real criminals.

So as a lifelong student of crime, I was certainly drawn towards Crime Wave: A Filmgoer’s Guide to the Great Crime Movies (I.B. Tauris, 288 pp. $22.50). The book, written by film critic Howard Hughes (not to be confused with the eccentric billionaire), offers a companion book to one’s crime film home collection.

As Hughes notes in his preface, the world of crime is full of unpleasant people, yet crime movies hold a special place in cinema audiences’ affections. The movies Hughes chose to cover in the book are those he considers seminal Hollywood films, both in their genre and respective eras.

"Crime Wave includes the classic gangster flicks of the thirties and forties, often detailing bootlegging, robbery and smuggling: The Public Enemy, High Sierra, White Heat," Hughes wrote. "I also trace the development of the post-war film noir style, from The Maltese Falcon and Kiss Me Deadly to the knowing post-modernism of Chinatown and L.A. Confidential."

"There are tough B-movies from the thrifty fifties, such as The Big Combo; tales of gangster revenge (Point Blank and Get Carter) and Quentin Tarantino’s genre-referential Pulp Fiction. There are heist and caper movies, epitomized by The Asphalt Jungle and Ocean’s Eleven. Also discussed are lone, rule-breaking cops (Dirty Harry), buddy cops (Lethal Weapon), global crime (On Her Majesty’s Secret Service), blaxpoitation action (Shaft) and even a gangster love story: Bonnie and Clyde."


"And of course there are the four great gangster epics, directed by Martin Scorsese, Sergio Leone and Francis Ford Coppola: GoodFellas, Once Upon a Time in America, The Godfather, and The Godfather Part II," Hughes writes in the preface to the book.

And as Hughes tells his readers, in the book’s chapters you’ll come into contact with the crime movie stars like Jimmy Cagney on top of the world, Humphrey Bogart pursuing the black bird, Sterling Hayden prowling the asphalt jungle, Lee Marvin escaping Alcatraz, Clint Eastwood feeling lucky, Michael Caine spilling blood on the Tyne, Joe Pesci getting whacked and Robert De Niro being a wiseguy.

For me, Jimmy Cagney was one of the best cinema gangsters. Although he was a short man, he had great film presence. The baby-faced dancer and former boxer from the Lower East Side of New York was superb in The Public Enemy, Angels With Dirty Faces and The Roaring Twenties. He was a cocky, strutting tough guy. He is unforgettable.

An older, heavier Cagney revisited the gangster film in 1949 with his brilliant performance in White Heat, which Hughes states is Cagney’s greatest film. I’m inclined to agree. "Top of the world, Ma!" The film is a must for all crime film buffs.

Hughes does a good job of explaining the background to the crime films, from their inspirations from other films, novels and true stories to the people behind the scenes of the film’s production. From studio bosses to the directors, writers and money men, we see how the films developed into the classics we love today.

I especially enjoyed his chapter on 1971’s Get Carter. Michael Caine was terrific as a British villain out to avenge his brother’s death. Caine, like Cagney, grew up among real hoods and said that up to Get Carter, British gangsters were portrayed as stupid or funny and he knew some who were neither.

His Jack Carter character in the film is a mean guy with a mission. Those viewers only familiar with Caine in his more recent elderly roles may be surprised at his dark side. Caine is all psychotic killer here.

As Hughes points out, the director, Mike Hodges, references great detective fiction in the film, with Caine reading Raymond Chandler’s Farewell My Lovely on a train and there are two rival gangs, as in Dashiell Hammett’s Red Harvest, with Carter, like the Continental-Op, trapped between the two.

Mike Hodges also directed Caine in another somewhat lighter crime film the following year. 1972’s Pulp also references detective fiction, but in this film, Caine portrays a writer of pulp crime fiction. I love the film and get a kick out of the jokes at the expense of writers. When Caine is hired to ghost-write the autobiography of a movie star/gangster (sort of a latter-day George Raft), he gets involved in murder and political intrigue on the island of Malta.

I love Caine’s voice-over narration, which does not quite match what viewers see on the screen. (The voice-over talks of his drinking champagne, but Caine is seen clearly drinking beer). This is a device later used to less effect in a Tom Selleck crime comedy.

"The writer's life would be ideal," Caine tells us. "But for the writing."

When Caine points out a relevant fact, he's asked how he knew this.

"I write crap like this every day. It's my job." Caine, the pulp writer, replies drolly.

Hodges and Caine were set to make another film together based on the life on British traitor and spy Kim Philby. According to Hughes, Philby, an upper-class twit then living as a defector in the Soviet Union, vetoed the casting of Caine.

Hughes quotes Caine as saying, "It seemed he didn’t like the idea of someone of my class playing him, which I thought was spoken like a true communist."

Hodges would go on to direct Clive Owen in Croupier, another interesting crime film with a writer for a protagonist. Perhaps because Owens wore a tuxedo as a casino croupier in the film, the speculation began that Owens would or should play James Bond. Although I thought Daniel Craig was fine as James Bond in Casino Royale – I think he was widely accepted in large part because the producers made a true thriller rather than a cartoon – I believe Owen would have been far better as he fits Ian Fleming’s physical description of Bond.

Owen is now set portray another of my childhood fictional crime heroes, Philip Marlowe. He is said to star in a series of films based on the tough, wisecracking private detective of the 1940s from the novels by Raymond Chandler. I’m looking forward to seeing the films.

In his chapter on global crime, Hughes chooses the 1969 James Bond film, On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (OHMSS). Hughes notes that of all the actors to play Bond, George Lazenby is the least remembered and OHMSS is the most overlooked of the Bond films.

"And yet in its depiction of Bond’s battle with corruption, extortion and organized crime on a global scale, OHMSS has aged much better than its contemporaries and remains one of the most elaborate and exciting crime thrillers of the sixties," Hughes writes.

The film is one of my favorites and I wish that Connery had started in it, as I would have loved to seen him with Diana Rigg and Telly Savalas as Blofeld. But I always thought Lazenby did a fine job, all things considered. 

He was not an actor, and he was following Connery in the role. Had he stayed with the series, he would have become a better actor and I’ve no doubt he would have made the role his own. (And we would not have had to endure Roger Moore’s lighthearted and lightweight portrayal of Bond).

"Bond is a crime-busting secret agent on a grand scale – a very distant relative of the G-man heroes of old," Hughes writes.

Lazenby looked like Bond, and he was very good in the fight scenes. But it was the director, as Hughes rightfully points out, that made OHMSS one of the best film adaptations of the Fleming novels. Peter Hunt, who served as the editor of the previous Bond films, was faithful to the novel and truly captured the feel and flavor of the Fleming/Bond world.

In OHMSS, we find Bond chasing Blofeld, the head of the international criminal organization SPECTRE, when he comes across a woman intent on killing herself. Bond saves her and discovers that her father is Marc Ange Draco, the head of the Union Corse, one of the biggest crime syndicates in Europe. He is pleased with Bond and tries to bribe him into marrying his daughter Tracy (Diana Rigg).

Bond of course refuses, stating that he doesn’t need the money and he has a bachelor’s taste for freedom. Just see more of her, Draco pleads, explaining that she has been self-destructive, but he senses something in her changed when she meets Bond.

Bond asks if he knows the whereabouts of Blofeld, who is a competitor of sorts to Draco. Draco claims not to know and says that if he did, "I would not tell Her Majesty’s Secret Service," he sneers. "But I might tell my future son-in-law."

OHMSS is a dark film, Hughes writes, beginning with an attempted suicide and ending with a wedding-day murder. Although From Russia With Love is my favorite Bond film and novel, OHMSS is one of the better films in the series and if Connery had been in it, it may very well have been the best.

"It’s all right," Bond tells the passing police officer as he sits in his car, cradling his bride who had just been shot and killed by Blofeld.

"There’s no hurry you see… we have all the time in the world."

Hughes offers a chapter on another of my favorite films, 1967’s Point Blank. Like Caine’s Carter, Lee Marvin’s Walker is one bad guy. He’s out for revenge and to get his money while systematically bringing down a crime syndicate in John Boorman’s classic film. Marvin, a Marine veteran of the WWII war in the Pacific, was the perfect hard-looking antihero.

Hughes also offers a chapter on 1971’s Dirty Harry, one of my favorite Don Siegel crime films. As Hughes rightly notes, this was the most influential cop movie of the 1970s. It captured the mood of the country as many Americans believed that criminals had more rights than crime victims and that the police were hampered by liberal laws. Clint Eastwood was excellent as Dirty Harry, the cop they gave all of the dirty jobs to. Unfortunately, I didn’t care for any of the sequels.

Hughes also writes about Siegel’s other great crime films, such as 1968’s Coogan’s Bluff, which also starred Eastwood.

I also liked 1968’s Madigan with Richard Widmark and Harry Guardino, a good character actor who also appeared in Dirty Harry. (I was told that Guardino was our second cousin on my mother’s side).

There are also interesting and informative chapters on other great films and on films that I’m not so keen on, such as Pulp Fiction and Ocean’s Eleven.

Tarantino, it seems to me, is all style and pop culture references, and not much else. And the less said about Ocean’s Eleven and the sequels the better. For that matter, I didn’t particularly care for Frank Sinatra’s original film either.

Hughes also writes chapters on The Godfather, The Godfather Part II, and what I consider the best crime film ever made, 1990’s GoodFellas. I’ve written about these great films before, and I will again in another column. Unlike Hughes, I would not lump Sergio Leone’s Once Upon a Time in America with these great films. I would add Scorsese’s Casino.

So if you are a crime film aficionado, Howard Hughes’s Crime Wave, with its photos, listings of movie credits and informative background material, should be a part of your library.                                                              

Note: The above column originally appeared in The Orchard Press Online Mystery Magazine in 2007. 

Sunday, July 26, 2026

My South Philly Review Column: An Interview With 3rd Police District Community Relations Officer ‘Ace’ Delgado

The South Philly Review posted my Crime Beat column with my interview with 3rd Police District Community Relations Officer Juan “Ace” Delgado.

The post is ahead of the print edition, which will come out later this week.

You can read the column via the link below:

An interview with 3rd Police District Community Relations Officer ‘Ace’ Delgado - PA Times Media 


Friday, July 24, 2026

My Crime Fiction: 'Joey Pinto'

 The below short story originally appeared in American Crime Magazine. 

Joey Pinto

 By Paul Davis

I stopped in at a cigar store and lounge in South Philadelphia this past week.

I bought a Cohiba cigar and took a seat among my fellow cigar aficionados. I lit my cigar and took a sip of the coffee I brought with me. There were some young cigar smokers in the shop, but most of the customers were, like me, older men.

A man about my age sat in the chair next to me. He lit his cigar and we exchanged greetings. He said he recognized me from the photo that was published alongside my crime column in the local paper.

Harry Smith, a retired Philadelphia police officer, mentioned names of people he knew and wondered if I knew them as well. South Philly, although heavily populated, often seemed to be like a small town, or, as we often noted, a small world.

One of the names Smith mentioned stood out to me in particular: Joe Pinto.

“Yes,” I said. I know Joey Pinto. We grew up together.”

“He had a heart attack and died, you know.”

I didn’t know.

 

In the mid and late 1960s Pinto, who was two years older than me, lived down the block from me on Iseminger Street, a clean street of neat row homes just east of 13th Street, between Shunk Street and Oregon Avenue in the mid and late 1960s.

Pinto was about six feet tall with dark curly hair and olive skin. Although he was no athlete and did not play sports with us, he lifted weights in his house, which made him quite muscular.

Pinto had a hard childhood. His mother took off with another man when Pinto was 12 and left him alone with his cold and mean-spirted father. His father, a Philadelphia police officer, mostly ignored his son, and Pinto practically raised himself.

Joey Pinto was part of our crowd, and despite being liked, he was often mocked for his lack of brains, naiveté and his outlandish, unbelievable bragging. I’m sorry to say that I, more than anyone, mocked him and enjoyed the laughter I received for my put-downs.

Pinto usually took the insults in good humor, which was one of the reasons why he was so well-liked.  

I was two or three years younger than the crew, as the teens were my older brother’s friends. I was the baby of the gang, but that did not stop me from being sarcastic. I would have probably been beaten up on occasion had it not been for the tough reputation of my older brother Eddie, but I’m proud to say that I never once threatened to sic my brother on anyone.

Still, the guys knew that I was the kid brother of the leader of the crew. But in truth, Eddie would have cracked me himself if I knew that I was running my mouth with the older guys.

During the summer months we hung on the corner of 13th and Oregon Avenue outside of JP’s luncheonette, which was across the street from the park. Although we were underage, we stood on the corner and drank beer and smoked pot. Often joining us were groups of young girls who liked to party with us.

In the cold winter months, when the miserable woman who ran the luncheonette tired of us and threw us out, we often ended up in Pinto’s house to escape the cold. Pinto’s father was seldom home, as he was in the bar around the corner when he was not working.

When Pinto would leave us in the living room to use the upstairs bathroom, one of the guys inevitably would bring up the time a few years earlier when Pinto’s mother, a most attractive woman in her 40s, came down the stairs when we were all sitting around the living room. She was clad in a see-through negligee. Her braless breasts swayed under the sheer negligee with each step and her visible brief white panties gave us all pause.

She smiled at us and said hello in a sexy voice, confirming that she enjoyed arousing the young boys. She left the Pinto house for good a year or so later, but like her son, we never forgot her.

One evening when six of us were smoking some good weed, we all got the “munchies.” An hour earlier Pinto’s father had come in carrying several bags of groceries. After he left for the bar, we all went into the kitchen, including Joey Pinto, and we tore into the food from the refrigerator and the cabinets. It was quite a feast.

When some hours later Pinto’s father came home, he found his son and us passed out on the couch and in the living room chairs.

“Jesus Christ,” we heard him holler as he looking into the refrigerator. “What the fuck happened to all of the food I just bought?”

We saw that as our cue and we got up and walked out of the house quickly and quietly, leaving Joey Pinto to deal with his father.        


I recall another evening when we were all a bit drunk and high. I laid into Pinto, our host, calling him as dumb as an ox. Usually, he did not respond to my sarcastic comments, but on this night, he took offense and told me to get out of his house.

“Sure,” I replied. “Step outside with me if you’re brave enough.”

Although I was training as a boxer at the South Philly Boys Club, Pinto was older, taller and more muscular than me.

I opened the door and stepped down on two of the three steps leading to the pavement in front of his house. I then turned around quickly and looked up at Pinto, who was coming out the door and taking off his shirt.

When his shirt was down around his elbows, effectively blocking his arms, I stepped up and hit him with a good overhand right. He stumbled backwards as the other guys came out and stepped between us.

Pinto got up and apologized to me and I apologized to him, and we went back into the house.

A couple of years later Pinto, despite his bravado about becoming a tough cop like his father, had no desire to become a tough soldier. He joined the Marine Reserves knowing that they would probably not be called up to go to Vietnam.

I, on the other hand, enlisted in the U.S. Navy in 1970 when I was 17, hoping to go to South Vietnam on a 100-foot coastal Swift boat. But after Boot Camp, I received orders to report to the aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk. The carrier set sail for Southeast Asia, and the Kitty Hawk performed combat sorties on “Yankee Station” in the Gulf of Tonkin in the South China Sea off the coast of North Vietnam.

I returned to South Philly in 1972 and discovered that our gang had moved exactly one city block, from the luncheonette on 13th and Oregan Avene to the Moonlighter Bar on 13th and Shunk. Although I was only 19 and a half, I was served by the bartender and owner as I was an accepted member of the crew that spent a lot of money in the bar.

Drugs were a growing thing, and sadly, many of the young guys in the neighborhood were taking heroin but were not yet full-blown drug addicts, so they drank in the bar in between their heroin fixes.

Pinto, who did not take drugs, not even pot, was also not much of a drinker and he would sip on one beer for hours.          

One night at the Moonlighter in 1973, one of the guys asked me about my time in the Navy. I began to give him the short version when I was interrupted by Pinto.

“Sailors are pussies,” Pinto said with a laugh. “We Marines are the real warriors in Vietnam.”

“Hell, Joey, what is this “we” shit? Did you see much combat in North Carolina? You joined the Marine Reserves to avoid Vietnam, so don’t play the warrior hero around me.” 

Pinto walked way without a word. 


I was working as a Defense Department civilian at the Defense Personnel Support Center, known locally as the “Quartermaster,” in 1980 when I met a beautiful woman at work. We dated and then married in 1982.

After I married, I stopped hanging at the bars with the old crew, but in 1983 Bobby Franco stopped me on the street and told me about a reunion of the old gang at a bar around the corner from my house. I was interested. Franco said his wife and some of the other wives were also coming, so I should bring my wife.

He also suggested that I tell my older brother Eddie about the reunion, as several of the “old head,” the older guys from our corner, like “Little Ant-ny,” whom my brother had been good friends with, would be there. I called my brother, but he was not interested.

I was, and I brought my young wife with me. The first guy to greet me and my wife in the bar was Joey Pinto. I introduced him to Dolores, my beautiful wife. He smiled and called her “Mrs. Paulie.” Then everyone started calling her Mrs. Paulie.

My wife got a kick out of the guys calling me “Paulie.” In South Philly, most of us were known by the diminutive of our first name. I never introduced myself as Paulie, but that was how I was known in the old crowd.

It was a fun evening. About 20 of the old gang came to the bar. As I sat at a table drinking with my wife, Pinto came over and sat with us. I asked him where his wife was. He said he was separated. I offered my condolences.

“My wife is a cop,” Pinto said. I heard he failed the police test several times until he finally passed the written test but then failed the psychological test. I found it interesting that he married a police officer.

“My wife beat me with her club, but I told her that I wasn’t gonna take it anymore, so she left me.”

I did not know how to respond. Neither did my wife. 

I was thinking that I could not imagine that happening to me, but if it did, I don’t believe I would tell anyone, least of all a woman I just met.

Thankfully, an old friend and his wife came over to say hello, and Pinto got up and went to the bar.


My next encounter with Joey Pinto occurred about ten years later in the early 1990s. While continuing to work for the Defense Department during the day, I was working part-time for the local paper covering crime at night and on weekends. The editor assigned me to cover a town watch group that had just started.

I met the leader of the neighborhood town watch. His name was Earl Butt, and I soon discovered why he was called “Butthead.”

Butt was about 5’10 with wavey reddish-brown hair and he wore thick glasses. He was a pretentious idiot. He was an insurance agent with dreams of becoming a politician.          

He said he was going to run for Congress because he was dedicated to South Philly.

I tried hard not to laugh at the way he described his role in keeping the neighborhood safe. He claimed the police were ineffective, but his town watch kept criminals away.

I wrote in my notebook, “clown watch.”

Most of the members of the town watch I met that night were good, earnest people, but one member was even more of a pretentious idiot than Butthead.

That would be Joey Pinto.

As I was speaking to Butthead, a bright light blinded me as Pinto jumped the curb on a bicycle. He turned off the spotlight and greeted me.

“Paulie, are you joining the town watch?”

I told him I was covering the watch for the newspaper. Pinto told Butthead that he grew up with me and we were good friends.

I smiled and looked at the huge, mounted lamp on his bicycle. Butthead lost interest in the conversation as we were not talking about him, so he walked away. (I later learned that he was so dedicated to South Philly that soon after our encounter he moved to New Jersey.)

Although Pinto failed in his quest to become a police officer, it appeared he threw himself wholeheartedly into the town watch. He said he used his lamp to illuminate the dark streets that he patrolled at night.

Pinto shook my hand and rode off, switching on a lamp one might associate more with a prison guard tower rather than a bicycle.

I was left on the sidewalk with a town watch member who seemed normal. Bill Bruno was a short, balding man in his 40s. He said he was part of the town watch because he wanted to do his part in keeping the neighborhood where his wife and children lived as safe as possible.

“Do you know Joey Pinto?” he asked.

“Yeah, we grew up together.”

“Um…”

“Yeah, I know,” I said, reading his mind. “Joey is a bit of a goofball.” 

“He’s nuts. Did you see that light on his bike? Last week he saw a group of young guys smoking marijuana on a corner, and he rode up to them with that spotlight glaring in their eyes.”

“That sounds like Joey.”

“They pulled him off his bike and beat the crap out of him.”   

I decided to focus my newspaper piece on Bruno and I quoted him extensively, although not about Pinto’s run-in with some angry corner boys. To be fair, I also mentioned Butts and Pinto briefly in the piece.


My last encounter with Joey Pinto occurred about a month later as I waited on a corner for the traffic light to turn green.

A truck passed me and then pulled over. Pinto jumped out of the truck and walked over to me. He pumped my hand with a firm shake and thanked me for mentioning him in my newspaper piece.

“I’m working at a wholesale warehouse,” he said. “I drive the delivery truck four days a week and I work in the warehouse four days a week.”

“That’s eight days a week.”

“Ah…”

“That’s OK. I understand.”

 

I took a draw from my Cohiba and said it was a shame he died.

“He was a goof, but a likeable guy,” I said.  

“I worked with Pinto in the 1st District for a while,” Harry Smith said. “And he was called much worse things than goof.” 

“You mean Joey finally became a cop? Good for him. That was his life-long dream." 

“Yeah, he retired after a traffic injury. He was lucky that he wasn’t prosecuted for driving recklessly. I don’t like to speak ill of the dead, but he was an idiot.”

“But likeable.”

“Yeah,” Smith admitted. “One could not help but like the fool.” 

© 2026 By Paul Davis  

Note: You can read my other crime fiction stories via the link below:

Paul Davis On Crime: My Crime Fiction Stories 

Thursday, July 23, 2026

My Philly Daily On Crime Column: The U.S. Should Capture And Arrest Raul Castro

Philly Daily ran my On Crime column today on why we should capture and arrest Raul Castro.

You can read the column via the link below or the following text:

Paul Davis: U.S. should capture and arrest Raul Castro – Philly Daily  

At a press conference on January 3rd President Donald Trump announced the arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro following a successful overnight joint U.S. military/U.S. law enforcement extraction in Venezuela's capital city of Caracas.

"Last night and early today, at my direction, the United States armed forces conducted an extraordinary military operation in the capital of Venezuela. It was an operation against a heavily fortified military fortress in the heart of Caracas to bring outlaw dictator Nicolás Maduro to justice," Trump said during a midday news conference from his Mar-a-Lago home in Palm Beach, Florida.  

President Trump noted that both Maduro and his also-captured wife, Cilia Flores de Maduro, will now face criminal court proceedings on multiple federal charges, including narco-terrorism, conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy, and weapons offenses.

This was an amazing, near-perfect operation, and the result was not only Maduro’s capture and arrest, but it also pivoted Venezuela towards America and away from Communist China and Cuba.

Which brings me to Cuba.

President Trump should send in the troops to Cuba and arrest Raul Castro for murder.

This past May the U.S. Justice Department announced the unsealing of a superseding indictment charging Cuban Communist leader Raul Castro and other Cuban officials for their alleged roles in the February 24, 1996 shoot‑down of two unarmed U.S. civilian aircraft operated by Brothers to the Rescue (BTTR), also known as Hermanos al Rescate, over international waters.

“Over three decades later, we are committed to holding those accountable for the murders of four brave Americans: Carlos Costa, Armando Alejandre Jr., Mario de la Peña, and Pablo Morales,” said Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. “For the first time in nearly 70 years, senior leadership of the Cuban regime has been charged in the United States for alleged acts of violence resulting in the deaths of American citizens. President Trump and this Justice Department are committed to restoring a simple principle: if you kill Americans, we will pursue you. No matter who you are. No matter what title you hold.”

FBI Director Kash Patel added, “Today’s superseding indictment of Raul Castro and five Castro regime co-defendants is a major step toward accountability in the 1996 murders of four Brothers to the Rescue members - including three U.S citizens - Carlos Costa, Armando Alejandro Jr, Mario de la Pena, and Pablo Morales. For 30 years these families have waited for answers - and this FBI never forgot. We will continue working with our Justice Department partners to bring to justice those who attacked our civilians.”

According to the Justice Department, BTTR was an organization based in Miami that conducted humanitarian flight operations across the Florida Straits to search for Cuban migrants in distress. As alleged, beginning in the early 1990s, Cuban intelligence agents infiltrated the organization and relayed detailed information about its flight operations back to the Cuban government. These reports were allegedly used by military leadership in planning the Feb. 24, 1996 operation.

The superseding indictment charges conspiracy to kill U.S. nationals, two counts of destruction of aircraft, and four counts of murder.

According to the allegations, on Feb. 24, 1996, three BTTR aircraft flew from South Florida toward Cuba. Cuban military fighter jets under the chain of command overseen by Raul Castro fired air‑to‑air missiles at two unarmed civilian Cessna aircraft — destroying them without warning while they were flying outside Cuban territory, killing four U.S. nationals, including three U.S. citizens: Carlos Costa, Armando Alejandre Jr., Mario de la Peña and Pablo Morales.

The indictment further alleges that, in the weeks prior to the attack, Cuban military pilots conducted training exercises designed to locate and intercept slow‑moving civilian aircraft. On the day of the incident, three BTTR planes departed from Opa‑locka Airport for a planned humanitarian flight south of the 24th parallel. Two of the aircraft — tail numbers N2456S and N5485S — were allegedly targeted and shot down in international airspace, resulting in the deaths of all four victims.

The Justice Department stated that if convicted, the defendants face a maximum penalty of death or life imprisonment on the murder and conspiracy to kill U.S. nationals counts.

Although we were unable to bring Raul Castro’s older brother, Communist dictator Fidel Castro, to justice during his long and murderous lifetime (although I suspect he met heavenly justice), we have the opportunity to bring Raul Castro to justice.

And a joint U.S. military/U.S. law enforcement extraction operation to capture and arrest Raul Castro will, I believe, be the proverbial last nail in the coffin of Cuba’s failed Communist government.

Like Venezuela, Cuba will become an ally of the United States. Then the island will prosper and the people will finally live free.

Paul Davis’s On Crime column appears here each week. He is also a contributor to Broad + Liberty and Counterterrorism magazine. He can be reached via pauldavisoncrime.com.