Showing posts with label Ric Prado. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ric Prado. Show all posts

Thursday, March 7, 2024

My Counterterrorism Magazine Piece On How The FBI Caught The Traitorous Cuban Spies

Counterterrorism magazine ran my piece on how the FBI caught the traitorous Cuban spies.

You can read the piece via the below pages or the below text:




How the FBI Caught the Traitorous Cuban Spies

By Paul Davis

 When one thinks of the threat of spies in the United States, one usually thinks of the Soviet KGB and Communist China’s MSS. But as many CIA officers and FBI special agents are quick to note, Communist Cuba’s Intelligence Directorate (DI) is a formidable foe and a true threat to American national security.

The Directorate General of Intelligence (DGI) was established in 1961 when Fidel Castro took over of the Caribbean Island. Tutored by the Soviet KGB, the DGI became responsible for intelligence, counterintelligence, and disinformation both inside Cuba and abroad. The name of Cuban intelligence was changed to the DI in 1989.

On December 4, 2023, the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Florida, in Miami announced that they had charged Victor Manuel Rocha (seen in the above photo), 73, of Miami, Florida, with committing multiple federal crimes by secretly acting for decades as an agent of the government of Communist Cuba.

Like Kendall Myers, a former State Department official, who along with his wife Gwendolyn, was convicted of spying for Cuba in 2010, and Ana Montes (seen in the above photo receiving an award from then-CIA Director George Tenet), a former Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) analyst who was convicted of spying for Cuba in 2002, Rocha stands accused of being run successfully as a spy for many years by Cuba intelligence.

Rocha, a former U.S. Department of State employee, served on the National Security Council from 1994 to 1995 and ultimately as the U.S. Ambassador to Bolivia from 2000 to 2002.

“This action exposes one of the highest-reaching and longest-lasting infiltrations of the United States government by a foreign agent,” Attorney General Merrick B. Garland said. “We allege that for over 40 years, Victor Manuel Rocha served as an agent of the Cuban government and sought out and obtained positions within the United States government that would provide him with access to non-public information and the ability to affect U.S. foreign policy. Those who have the privilege of serving in the government of the United States are given an enormous amount of trust by the public we serve. To betray that trust by falsely pledging loyalty to the United States while serving a foreign power is a crime that will be met with the full force of the Justice Department.”

Also weighing in was FBI Director Christophr Wray, who stated, “Like all federal officials, U.S. diplomats swear an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. Acting as an agent for Cuba – a hostile foreign power – is a blatant violation of that oath and betrays the trust of the American people.”

According to the federal criminal complaint, beginning approximately in 1981, and continuing to the present, Rocha, a naturalized U.S. citizen originally from Colombia, secretly supported the Republic of Cuba and its clandestine intelligence-gathering mission against the United States by serving as a covert agent of Cuba’s DGI.

Rocha obtained employment in the U.S. Department of State between 1981 and 2002, in positions that provided him access to nonpublic information, including classified information, and the ability to affect U.S. foreign policy. After his State Department employment ended, Rocha engaged in other acts intended to support Cuba’s intelligence services. From around 2006 until 2012, Rocha was an advisor to the Commander of the U.S. Southern Command, a joint command of the United States military whose area of responsibility includes Cuba.

The complaint further alleges that Rocha kept his status as a Cuban agent secret in order to protect himself and others and to allow himself the opportunity to engage in additional clandestine activity. Rocha provided false and misleading information to the United States to maintain his secret mission; traveled outside the United States to meet with Cuban intelligence operatives; and made false and misleading statements to obtain travel documents.

Rocha began his State Department career in 1981, rising through the ranks to serve in a variety of roles, including being the First Secretary at the U.S. Embassy in Mexico City, Mexico, the Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, the Director of Inter-American Affairs on the U.S. National Security Council, with special responsibility for, among other things, Cuba, the Deputy Principal Officer at the U.S. Interests Section in Havana, Cuba, the Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and  he served as the Ambassador to Bolivia at the U.S. Embassy in La Paz, Bolivia.

The Justice Department alleges that, in a series of meetings during 2022 and 2023 with an FBI undercover agent posing as a Cuban intelligence officer, Rocha made repeated statements admitting his “decades” of work for Cuba, spanning “40 years.”

When the undercover agent told Rocha he was “a covert representative here in Miami” whose mission was “to contact you, introduce myself as your new contact, and establish a new communication plan,” Rocha answered “Yes,” and proceeded to engage in a lengthy conversation during which he described and celebrated his activity as a Cuban intelligence agent.

Throughout the meetings, Rocha behaved as a Cuban agent, consistently referring to the United States as “the enemy,” and using the term “we” to describe himself and Cuba. Rocha additionally praised Fidel Castro as the “Comandante,” and referred to his contacts in Cuban intelligence as his “Compañeros” (comrades) and to the Cuban intelligence services as the Dirección.” Rocha described his work as a Cuban agent as “a grand slam.”

Rocha is charged with conspiring to act as an agent of a foreign government without prior notification to the Attorney General; acting as an agent of a foreign government without prior notification to the Attorney General; and with using a passport obtained by false statement.

Cuban American Enrique “Ric” Prado (seen in the above photo), a retired CIA official and the author of “Black Ops: The Life of a CIA Shadow Warrior,” spoke of the arrest of Rocha and Ana Montes, who was recently released from prison after serving 20 years for spying for Cuba. 

“We should enforce harder measures on those who betray our government’s trust.” 

 

When asked if Rocha appears to be a different sort of spy than Montes, he replied, “The cases are similar and the damage to our security is immeasurable. My colleagues opine that Rocha did more damage than Montes based on his greater access as an ambassador.’

 

Prado believes Rocha and Montes should rot in jail.

Prado, who stated that he fought communism as a CIA officer in five different incarnations, especially his three years working in the Contra camps and helping to “dethrone” the Soviet and Cuban-back Sandinista regime, said the DGI did a good job running these two for as long as they did.

 

“Remember, however, Cuban intelligence has only one enemy, the US of A. Unlike western intelligence services, who have to deal with all the “isms,” such as communism, terrorism, anarchism, and radicalism, Cuban intelligence is omni-focused on the U.S.” 



The Cuban DI ran Ana Montes (seen in the above mugshot) as a spy for 17 years. At the Defense Intelligence Agency, Ana Montes was the go-to expert on Cuba. Her colleagues called her the “Queen of Cuba,” but they were unaware that she was also spying for the communist nation. 

Montes is the daughter of a former U.S. Army colonel, sister of an FBI translator, sister of an FBI agent, and briefly the girlfriend of a defense analyst for the Southern Command, but she chose to betray her country. 

She led a double life, working as a senior analyst for the DIA and as a spy for Cuban intelligence. According to the FBI, her downfall began in 1996, when an astute DIA colleague named Scott W. Carmichal - acting on a gut feeling - reported to a security official that he felt Montes might be under the influence of Cuban intelligence. The official interviewed her, but she admitted nothing.

Four years later, Carmichael learned that the FBI was working to uncover an unidentified Cuban agent operating in Washington. He contacted the Bureau with his suspicions. After a careful review of the facts, the FBI opened an investigation.

Through physical and electronic surveillance and covert searches, some of which remains classified, the FBI was able to build a case against Montes. Agents also wanted to identify her Cuban handler and they were waiting for a face-to-face meeting between the two of them, putting off her arrest. But as Montes was about to be assigned work related to U.S. war plans after 9/11, she was finally arrested.

Peter Lapp (seen in the above photo) was the FBI’s co-case agent, along with FBI agent Steve McCoy, of the espionage investigation of Ana Montes, who was arrested ten days after 9/11. Lapp, now retired from the FBI after serving 22-years, wrote about Montes in his book, “Queen of Cuba: An FBI Agent's Insider Account of the Spy Who Evaded Detection for 17 Years.” 

He was asked about the Rocha case. “I’m not surprised at his arrest, because the Cubans for decades have targeted the State Department for agents and sources.  Kendall Myers (seen in the below mugshot) is a good example of a successful Cuban intelligence operation against the State Department. 

“Rocha had access to classified information in his career at various points. But Ana Montes would sit down every day and log onto a top-secret computer system. There were times in his career, such as when he worked at the White House National Security Council, he would do those kind of things. But he’s at a higher level. He’s in the diplomatic corps, he’s in positions where he’s not just looking at intelligence. He’s interacting and trying to execute the policy of the president at that point in time.” 

Lapp said he saw Rocha as being more beneficial to the Cubans than Montes from a policy influence perspective, with the ability to shape or influence U.S. policy. 

“But day in and day out, Montes clearly had a lot more hands-on access to top secret classified information that the Cubans would have benefited from. The Cubans got value out of both of them in different ways.” 

Rocha was arrested after an FBI sting. Lapp was asked to explain in general terms how FBI counterintelligence stings work. 

“The mannerisms of the sting operation against Wendall Myers were almost a carbon copy of the Rocha sting. Clearly, Myers had not been in touch with the Cubans for a while and he didn’t have an active DGI handler,” Lapp explained. “The FBI used an individual who walked like a duck and talked like a duck. He didn’t know the secret handshake, but he handed Myers a Cuban cigar and said happy birthday on behalf of your former friends. And that started a new relationship that was orchestrated by the FBI. 

“Myers completely implicated himself in passing national defense information. He sat down with the undercover FBI agent in multiple meetings and almost did a recounting of a lot of the classified information that he had passed over the years, which was his downfall. It was very stupid of Myers to do that. The undercover did a great job of eliciting more information out of him that really made the case. So he, so to speak, hung himself. He’s spending a lifetime in prison because of what he told that undercover.” 

Lapp said that he was very involved with the Kendall Myers undercover operation. Lapp was the first FBI agent that Myers had encountered. 

“So fast forward to Rocha. Rocha makes admissions to a guy who walks like a duck and talks like a duck, to validate the fact that he had been doing this for years. But what he didn’t do was cross that line,” Lapp said. “He didn’t give the undercover an accounting of classified information he passed, so the Bureau didn’t have the espionage charge, because Rocha didn’t help them like Kendall Myers did. The FBI had enough to charge him with being an unregistered agent, which is a crime, but it is a much lesser charge than espionage.” 

“Pound for pound, Cuban intelligence is one of the best in the world. They only have about 1,500 or 2,000 people worldwide but look what they have been able to accomplish against the United States intelligence community, which includes the FBI. They kicked our asses for years,” Lapp said.    

“They have the ability to find individuals who aren’t motivated by greed, unlike slimeballs spies like Hanssen and Ames. The spies the Russians find are only motivated by money and they have other psychological issues.” 

Lapp noted that the Cubans barter their gained intelligence with the Russians and other likeminded people and governments. 

When asked about Ana Montes, Lapp said, “I had three different sets of interactions with her. There was the day of her arrest, when Steve McCoy and I arrested her, and I put the handcuffs on her. I was with her for the seven months we debriefed her. We would sit with her for hours and hours and debrief what she did and how she did it. I later visited her in prison in 2004. It was a brief 30-minute meeting, just her and I. 

“Ana Montes was very intelligent, intellectually arrogant, and she had a degree of hypocrisy to her. And she is unfortunately free right now.” 

Montes is believed to have passed along intelligence that was responsible directly for the death of a Green Beret in Latin America When asked if he felt she was responsible for the Green Beret death, Lapp replied yes, but he could not prove it. 

Rocha recently changed his initial not guilty plea in a court in Miami. He admitted to being a longtime spy for Cuba. Rocha will be sentenced at a hearing on 12 April.

After the arrest of Rocha, FBI Director Christopher Wray stated, “The FBI will continue to rigorously defend against foreign governments targeting America, and we will find and hold accountable anyone who violates their oath to the United States, no matter how long it takes.”

Paul Davis, a long-time contributor to The Journal, also writes the IACSP’s online “Threatcon” column. 

Tuesday, June 28, 2022

Black Ops CIA Shadow Warrior: My Q&A With Legendary CIA Counterterrorism Officer Ric Prado

Counterterrorism magazine published my Q&A with CIA legend Ric Prado. 

You can read the interview via the below pages or the below text:





My Q&A with CIA Legend Ric Prado

 

Enrique “Ric” Prado is a paramilitary, counterterrorism, and special/clandestine operations specialist, with a focus on international training operations and programs. He is a 24-year veteran of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), where he served as an Operations Officer in six overseas posts. He was Deputy Chief of Station and “Plank Owner” of the original Bin Ladin Task Force/Issues Station under Senior Analyst Michael Scheuer, as well as Chief of Station in a hostile Muslim country. He also served as Chief of Operations in the CIA’s Counterterrorist Center (CTC) during the September 11th attacks, where he helped coordinate CIA/CTC’s special operations (SPECOPS) activities with the National Security Council and FBI, as well as with elite U.S. military representatives from Delta Force and SEAL-Team Six, then detailed to CTC/CIA. He retired as Senior Intel Service-2 (SIS-2, Major General equivalent at CIA).

 

Ric Prado spent his first ten years at CIA as a paramilitary officer in Special Operations Group/Special Activities Division (SOG/SAD, Ground Branch) which is CIA’s “special operations force.” His service included 36 months in Central America jungles as the first CIA officer living in the anti-Sandinista “Contra” camps. Subsequently running counterterrorism/insurgency operations in Peru and in the Philippines. Other key positions included head of the CIA’s Korean Operations and Chief of CIA Liaison in Seoul, ROK. He is fluent in his native Spanish and once held a 2+ level in Japanese.

 

His military training and qualifications include Airborne, SCUBA, Advance Combat Medical Rescue, S.E.R.E., Mountain Climbing, and Jungle Survival under the auspices of the US Air Force elite Pararescue Teams (1971-1976). CIA training included: Ops/Case Officer certification training (The Farm), Counterterrorist Operations, Advanced Tradecraft Course, Free-Fall parachuting, Draeger close-circuit (Combat Diver’s 1984 and SEALS 2003), Korean Ops, and numerous CT driving and weapons-related courses. Ric Prado is also a graduate of the elite Henk Iverson’s Lone Operator course (2018).

 

Ric Prado retired from the CIA in 2004. He is now co-owner of Camp X, Special Operations Lone Operator Training Group and continues his service training and supporting the “SPECOPS” Community as Subject Matter Expert (SME) at the SWCS’ ASOT (Advanced Special Operations and Techniques) and ASOT Managers Course, Dragon Warrior, Emerald Warrior, among others.

 

Ric Prado is the author of “Black Ops: The Life of a CIA Shadow Warrior.”

 

He was interviewed by Paul Davis.

 

IACSP: I enjoyed reading “Black Ops.” I found it most interesting. Why did you write the book?

Prado: I never thought of being an author, much less a best-selling author. As you know, the book made the New York Times Best Seller list at number seven. I kind of grew weary of the reputation that my agency has, mostly in Hollywood and in most novels. The CIA is the most maligned and misunderstood federal agency in the U.S. Government. My colleagues are always described as immoral and corrupt, and as maniacal assassins like the fictional character Jason Borne. We have 137 stars (representing the death of CIA personnel in the line of duty) on the Wall of Honor at the agency, and we are a small organization compared to the Army the Navy and the Air Force. Some of these people I personally knew. It kind of bothered me that their grandchildren will learn about the agency and their grandpas, not to mention my own grandson, primarily from Hollywood. That was the primary reason I wrote the book. To try to put a realistic spin not only on the kind of operations that we do, but on the kind of people that we have in our ranks. Patriots. People who have dedicated their lives, mostly anonymous, to this country. The second part is communism. I am Cuban born. I lived under communism and my wife lived under communism. We saw what communism did to our first country. So I wanted to write a book about my efforts to counter and fight communism in my different incarnations.

IACSP: For many Americans, the CIA appears to be unapproachable and unknowing. This can lead to misconceptions. As you noted, most people only know about the CIA from spy thrillers. When I was in the Navy and later as a Defense Department civilian employee doing security work, I received CIA training and regular briefings, and as a writer, I’ve interviewed a good number of CIA officers here for the Journal. The CIA officers I’ve known are dedicated government employees serving America. Books like yours, it seems to me, can go a long way to counter misconceptions.

Prado: When I do public speaking, one of the questions I always ask is to name me two movies that represents the CIA in a positive way. There is always one person who will say Jason Borne, and then I’ll say, a maniacal assassin with 17 personalities who is being hunted down by the CIA is a good movie about the CIA?

IACSP: There are terrorist organizations, transnational criminal organizations, and rogue nations, and the Jason Borne movies choose to make the CIA the bad guy. Silly. I thought Tom Clancy’s novels were fairly realistic, would you agree?

Prado: Tom Clancy’s books were always very realistic. I have several of his books and “Without Remorse” is one of my favorite novels.

IACSP: One of my favorites as well. Did you see the poor film adaptation?”

Prado: It was awful.

IACSP: Do you think Cuba will ever be free of communism now that Fidel Castro, the bastard, is dead?

Prado: We have one more bastard Castro, which is Raul. He is retired, but he is still the power. I honestly believe if we play our cards right in this country, we can entice change in Cuba. Stick and carrot. Sanctions, sanctions, sanctions. If you do this, we’ll do that. I want to go back to Cuba and visit my grandfather’s grave, their house. That is one of my dreams.

IACSP: Many people, even today, view the Contras as gun and drug traffickers and brutal thugs. You offer a different view in your book, although you encountered some bad apples. How would you describe the Contras?

Prado: Of all my assignments, I would put my Contra experience as number one for three reasons. The first reason is as a Cuban kid, fresh off the banana boat, working for CIA and now I’m the only man allowed to be at the camps training these folks. Striking back at the very same animal that destroyed my family in my first country. There was a visceral satisfaction of the operations we did. It became politized at home, but the greater majority of the Contras had personal reasons for joining, as they explained to me at campfires – they burned my church down, they kicked out my priest, they raped my daughter, they conscripted my underage son. It was all personal. When I was in front of Congress later on, I was able to voice those opinions and observations. The Contras were a class act of people and I’m still in touch with two or three of them.

IACSP: You also write about your time in the Philippines from 1990 to 1992. I was a frequent visitor to the Philippine during the Vietnam War when I served on an aircraft carrier. The Philippines has a dual threat in the communist New People’s Army (NPA) and the Islamic terrorist organizations, yet one does not read or hear much those threats.

Prado: They are two different animals, but similar in their destructive capabilities. When I was there, the NPA was in Manila and all the major cities, and we were providing incredible training to the Filipinos. I worked with the Philippine Constabulary, the Navy and the Army. I love the Philippines. They are warm, loving people until it is time to fight, and they are pretty good at it. I respect that. When I was there, they were on the brink of losing to the NPA. The Islamic terrorist group Abu Sayyaf down south was just coming up and they have gotten more radical. They are really just a bunch of bandits. We did a lot of damage to the NPA and also to Abu Sayyaf, because we had all kinds of maritime platforms that we gave the Navy to cover 7,000 islands. I was the liaison guy. Going to all these places once a week, I was meeting with commanders, offering training, getting the intelligence, and noting what they needed. It was very rewarding.

IACSP: You later worked in the CIA’s Counterterrorism Center (CTC). Can you give us an overview of the CTC prior to and after 9/11?

Prado: The Counterterrorist Center was started by Dewey Claridge, one of my mentors, in 1986. He was bigger than life. I loved him until the day he died. My first CT assignment was to a Latin American country that I cannot mention, in 1998, two years after the center started. I recruited a terrorist, and I did all kind of stuff. The CTC was small back then, 50-60 people. It kept growing as the need kept growing. I came back in 1995 when they asked me to open up the bin Laden task force, “Alec Station.” I was the deputy chief of station working the bin Laden account and the chief was Michael Scheuer, an analyst. I went back as the chief of operations in May of 2001. The 9/11 attack happened was shortly thereafter.

IACSP: Your account in the book of the CIA officers working around the clock during the attack and post-attack was very interesting. I was stationed at a naval base in Philadelphia on 9/11, and we didn’t know if and where there would be another attack after the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. I recall that it was a harrowing time. Certainly, the CIA was a possible target.

Prado: The CIA was evacuated, but most of the folks at the CTC stayed behind. I slept in my office for the first three days. So did dozens and dozens of my colleagues. After being the chief of operations, I came back with a very robust program, and I briefed Vice President Dick Cheney and Condoleezza Rice. It was approved, but we were never allowed to deploy. We were hearing all this chatter going on before 9/11. We knew it was al Qaeda and we were seeing their communications diminish and we were seeing people that we had under surveillance disappear. These were all clues that they were planning something big. I told CIA Director Tenet that if I had this program a year before 9/11, I would have gone out and neutralized three different al Qaeda senior support guys. That would be put the brakes on everything because they would have thought they were penetrated. That was the whole concept of the program. When I saw the program wasn’t going to ever really sail, I decided to retire on an operational high note. I spent the last three years in the CIA leading some of the best people I ever worked with, snooping and pooping all over the world, which not too many SIS-2 level guys get to do. Operationally, that was my high. If they weren’t willing to let me do what I do best, which was even approved by the White House, then to hell with it. Maybe it’s time for me to do something else, and I did.

IACSP: The Russian invasion of Ukraine is dominating the news now. You’ve said that the U.S. could do more to help the Ukrainians. What more can be done?

Prado: I think the world needs to do more to help the Ukrainians, not just the United States. Global security should be a team sport. The UN is pretty feckless. What amazes me is that we were “surprised,” quote unquote, that Putin invaded Ukraine. As soon as he took power, he said I am going to reconstitute the Soviet Union. He did two invasions before this one. I was really shocked that no one saw this coming. That’s what communism is. That’s what they did in Cuba, Vietnam and Venezuela. As far as helping the Ukrainians, my belief is that we were helping them for several years before this crisis. We were preparing them militarily, preparing them for stay-behind operations, preparing them for guerilla operations, and training them on the conventional use of missiles and other weapons. The Ukrainians have proven to be incredible fighters, but we should have opened up every warehouse we have with tanks, planes and missiles and ask our allies to do the same. The other thing is to shut down every nickel that goes to Russia. Instead of gradually choking, choking and choking, break their neck, without having to fight them directly.

IACSP: I like to think that our support of Ukraine is a bit of payback for the Soviet support of the Communist North Vietnamese and Viet Cong during the Vietnam War.

Prado: I hope that people read my book, because I honestly believe it will help people understand what the most secretive but capable agency does, how well it does it, and the patriotic ethos of the people that we have in our ranks.

IACSP: Thank you for speaking to us and thank you for your service.