Philly Daily & Broad + Liberty ran my On Crime column today on the upcoming James Bond film.
You can read the column via the link below or the following
text
Paul Davis: Looking forward to the new James Bond film
As fans eagerly await the next 007 film, they wonder what
actor will assume the role of Bond, James Bond.
As a James Bond film fan and Ian Fleming aficionado, I too am
waiting for the new film. I’ve been a Bond film fan since I first saw Sean
Connery as Bond in Dr. No when I was a kid in the early 1960s. After
viewing the second Bond film, From Russia With Love, I bought the Ian
Fleming novels, which I was pleased to discover were darker and more
complicated than the films.
I hope the new Bond film will be more faithful to Ian
Fleming’s classic novels, and I hope the producers will pick a good actor to
portray Bond.
Amazon acquired
control of the world-popular, billion dollar 64-year-long James Bond franchise last
year from the original producer Albert “Cubby” Broccoli’s daughter, Barbara Broccoli,
and his stepson, Michael G.
Wilson.
Amazon MGM
Studios and Broccoli and Wilson formed a new joint venture in which they will
co-own James Bond intellectual property rights, but Amazon MGM will have total creative
control. Financial terms weren't disclosed, but it was big, big bucks.
The deal has increased speculation, and British bookie’s bets, about who will portray the world’s most famous fictional secret agent and international crime fighter in a new film that is set to hit the big screen in 2028.
That will be seven years after the last Bond film, No Time to Die (it ought to have been called No Time To Think of a Better Title), which featured Daniel Craig’s last portrayal of James Bond.
The new film is being produced by David Heyman and Amy Pascal, and Denis Villeneuve, the director of Dune and Blade Runner 2049, is set to direct. Steven Knight, the creator of Peaky Blinders, is writing the screenplay. But the new James Bond actor has not yet been selected, or perhaps not yet announced.
Experienced and fairly well-known actors such as Callum
Turner, 36, and Aaron Taylor-Johnson, 36, are being named by the press (and
British bookies) as possibly the new Bond, but I suspect it will be a younger
actor (Sean Connery, the first cinema Bond - and still the best in my view -
was 32 when he filmed Dr. No), as well as a lesser-known and more rugged
actor.
I believe they will select a younger actor as the film makers
would like the new actor to do a 15-year run or more as James Bond. I also
suspect they want a more rugged and physical actor, harking back to the
ruggedly handsome Sean Connery, whom Ian Fleming first dismissed but later told
a friend that the Scot actor looked like his Bond and had the right physique, and
the rough-hewn, mug faced Daniel Craig. Movie audiences believed the two actors
would kill without hesitation. I think the film makers will shy away from
actors who, like Roger Moore and Pierce Brosnan, are traditionally handsome and
less intimidating.
There is also intense debate on what direction the new film will take, as Daniel Craig’s Bond character was killed in No Time To Die (apparently there was, in fact, time to die).
One speculated
direction that I would like the film makers to take is to reboot the series by
having the film set in the 1950s, the era in which author Ian Fleming first set
his Bond character.
I would also like the film makers to be more faithful to Fleming’s popular novels. And I would like the film makers to remake some of the sillier, action-comedies in the film canon, beginning with Sean Connery’s Diamonds Are Forever (1971) and all of Roger Moore’s Bond films from 1973 to 1985.
As a teenager in the
1960s I loved Roger Moore as Simon Templar in the TV series, The Saint.
He was debonair, tough and cool. I wish Moore had portrayed Bond as tough and
less comedic like Simon Templar.
I’d like to see a remake of Moonraker as a true thriller set in the post-WWII 1950s. The Moore film was silly, taking its cue from Star Wars. Fleming’s Moonraker novel was much darker. It had a great plot and a great villain, and it would make a great film.
Likewise, Diamonds Are Forever. Connery’s film was made as an action-comedy rather than a thriller. The film was amusing and well-made (as were Moore’s Bond films) but if one reads the Fleming novel, I suspect one will wish for a more faithful film version.
In the novel Diamonds Are Forever, Bond takes on the American mob and is much more realistic than the 1971 film. Anyone who reads the novel won’t soon forget the spa violence at the Saratoga Racetrack. There are many other unforgettable set pieces in the novel as well.
So, like millions of other Bond film fans, I eagerly await the arrival of the new Bond, James Bond.
Paul Davis’s On Crime column appears here each week. He is also a contributor to Broad + Liberty and Counterterrorism magazine. He can be reached via pauldavisoncrime.com








