Showing posts with label General George Washington. Show all posts
Showing posts with label General George Washington. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 5, 2016
On This In History: Washington Informs Congress Of Espionage
As History.com notes, on this day in 1775 General George Washington informed Congress that Dr Benjamin Church was committing espionage with the British.
You can read about the incident via the below link:
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/washington-informs-congress-of-espionage?cmpid=email-hist-tdih-2016-1005-10052016&om_rid=de5e4076c942a595dbda53f758321d197499484f6d117f61b6ac5c08e0d6f0aa&om_mid=96135571&kx_EmailCampaignID=7437&kx_EmailCampaignName=email-hist-tdih-2016-1005-10052016&kx_EmailRecipientID=de5e4076c942a595dbda53f758321d197499484f6d117f61b6ac5c08e0d6f0aa
Sunday, February 22, 2015
General George Washington: The American Revolution's Indispensible Man
Michael D. Schaffer, my former editor at the Philadelphia Inquirer, offers a review of Robert Middlekauff's Washington's Revolution: The Making of America's First Leader in today's Philadelphia Inquirer.
George Washington was the American Revolution's indispensable man.
That's the takeaway from Washington's Revolution, by Robert Middlekauff, professor emeritus of history at the University of California Berkeley. He says in the preface that the title reflects Washington's "enormous importance to the Revolution's course and outcome."
Franklin, Jefferson, and Adams all played major roles, but the Revolution could have gone on without them. Had Washington stopped a musket ball in battle, it's hard to imagine success for the revolutionaries. Middlekauff certainly can't imagine it. "None of the Americans around [Washington] in the army, the Congress or the states commanded the moral force he embodied. Success in maintaining the American effort would not have been achieved without him."
Washington, born 283 years ago today, was more than commander-in-chief of the Continental Army. "He was the political leader of the Revolution, though he drafted no legislation and signed no laws," Middlekauff writes. "But if he failed, it was widely understood, the Revolution failed."
You can read the rest of the review via the below link:
http://www.philly.com/philly/entertainment/literature/20150222_Books___Washington_s_Revolution__revolves_around_first_president.html
That's the takeaway from Washington's Revolution, by Robert Middlekauff, professor emeritus of history at the University of California Berkeley. He says in the preface that the title reflects Washington's "enormous importance to the Revolution's course and outcome."
Franklin, Jefferson, and Adams all played major roles, but the Revolution could have gone on without them. Had Washington stopped a musket ball in battle, it's hard to imagine success for the revolutionaries. Middlekauff certainly can't imagine it. "None of the Americans around [Washington] in the army, the Congress or the states commanded the moral force he embodied. Success in maintaining the American effort would not have been achieved without him."
Washington, born 283 years ago today, was more than commander-in-chief of the Continental Army. "He was the political leader of the Revolution, though he drafted no legislation and signed no laws," Middlekauff writes. "But if he failed, it was widely understood, the Revolution failed."
You can read the rest of the review via the below link:
http://www.philly.com/philly/entertainment/literature/20150222_Books___Washington_s_Revolution__revolves_around_first_president.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

