When There Was No Crying In The Newsroom

I recall back in the early 1970s when a comedian did an impression of President Richard Nixon addressing the nation. 

The comedian, doing Nixon’s dark scowl and deep, paranoid voice, stated that he was protecting American from the three evil “isms” - Fascism, Communism and journalism.

Even though I was an aspiring newspaper reporter at the time, I laughed. 

My late grandfather was a tough, old newspaper reporter and his claim to fame, he told us proudly, was that he covered the last public hanging in Wilmington, Delaware. I grew up reading newspapers, and I read books and watched films about tough and cynical American newspapermen. 

As a reporter, columnist and contributor to a good number of newspapers for more than 20 years, I've met some tough newspapermen. I've also come across some who were not so tough. One anti-Trump editor told me that we live in America's most contentious time. More contentious than the Civil War, I asked.    

America’s free press survived Nixon and the free press will survive Trump as well. 

Wesley Pruden offers a piece at the Washington Times on how these days many American journalists are easily offended and frightened.  

Everybody wants to be a snowflake, now including even newspapermen. There’s nothing inherently wrong with something called “World Press Freedom Day,” but journalism has always been a contact sport. That’s what made freedom of the press one of the best ideas the Founding Fathers ever came up with.

The United Nations keeps official track of important events such as World Environment Day, International Literacy Day and World Suicide Prevention Day, and 25 years ago added World Press Freedom Day to the calendar.

But many journalists, as grandees of press, tube and algorithm call themselves now that “reporter” is no longer a word large enough to call scribblers of the news trade, equate press criticism with actual threats of harm.

Mexican reporters have been killed by assassins of drug cartels, Russian reporters have died under suspicious circumstances and a reporter in Siberia who had been writing about military corruption was killed when he was pushed from a fifth-floor hotel balcony. In Afghanistan 10 reporters were killed in a single day.

So far, reporters in America have suffered no punishment greater than being sent to the dinner of the White House Correspondents’ Association, and you might think the grandees of the media would be grateful, except that gratitude has small currency in our present day.

Naturally, the villain of World Press Freedom Day this year is Donald Trump. “The White House deplored the Afghanistan attacks as ‘a senseless and heinous act,’” wrote columnist Patt Morrison in the Los Angeles Times, “and yet the Trump administration has wrought its own kind of damage on the principles of a free press here and, by echo effect, around the world.”

You can read the rest of the piece via the below link:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/may/3/when-there-was-no-crying-in-the-newsroom/

Note: The top photo is of the late, great newspaperman H.L. Mencken.

Leak: Why Mark Felt Became Deep Throat

Joseph C. Goulden, the veteran journalist and author, wrote an intersting review of Max Holland's  Leak: Why Mark Felt Became Deep Throat for dcbar.org.

The who of the Deep Throat mystery that captivated Washington for decades was not resolved until Mark Felt, the former number two man at the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), revealed in 2005 that he was the unnamed source who fed information to Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward during the Watergate investigation. But left dangling was why he chose to breach the bureau’s code of silence and give a journalist inside information on one of the more sensitive criminal investigations of the century.

In their first book on Watergate, All the President’s Men, published in 1974, Woodward and Post colleague Carl Bernstein depicted Deep Throat (who they did not name) as a selfless, high–ranking official intent on exposing the lawlessness of the Nixon White House. Deep Throat, they wrote, “was trying to protect the office [of the presidency] to effect a change in its conduct before all was lost.” A secondary goal was to prevent the FBI from being corrupted by being drawn into a White House cover–up.

That statement turns out to be 100 percent false, according to Max Holland, whose exhaustively researched work is a must-read for any person interested in the tangled scandal that drove President Nixon from office.

 

You can read the rest of the review via the below link:

 

http://www.dcbar.org/for_lawyers/resources/publications/washington_lawyer/august_2012/books.cfm