Wednesday, September 11, 2019
My Washington Times Piece On The Defense Of Border Patrol Agents
The Washington Times published my piece on the defense of Border Patrol agents.
While visiting San Antonio, Texas, a few years back, I had a couple of drinks with an off-duty Border Patrol agent in a local bar.
I mentioned that as a young sailor long ago I had often crossed over the border from San Diego to Tijuana and I had witnessed the Border Patrol agents at work.
Like many of the cops and agents I’ve known over the years, the agent was an entertaining and enlightening storyteller. At first, he talked about his odd and amusing experiences, but later he became solemn and talked about the tragedies he had witnessed on the border, and the dangers he and his fellow agents faced every day, especially with the increase in illegal border crossings.
I thought of the Border Patrol agent when I came across a July 4 statement from the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) executive committee that stated Border Patrol agents were being unfairly criticized.
The NBPC, an organization that represents and supports non-supervisory Border Patrol agents and support personnel, stated, “The men and women of the U.S. Border Patrol have been unfairly scrutinized, criticized and attacked by radical members of Congress, Immigrant Rights groups, the Fake News Media and the general public.
“These groups have made some ridiculous allegations against Border Patrol agents, going as far as saying that Border Patrol agents make detainees drink water from toilets, that Border Patrol agents engage in child abuse with detainees, and that Border Patrol agents engage in inhumane behavior with those that come into our custody.
“These allegations are without merit and are not based in fact. To attack Border Patrol agents without evidence does a disservice to the American Public, the rule of law, and law enforcement nationwide. Border Patrol agents work tirelessly to keep our country safe and are honorable, decent and hardworking public servants that risk their lives day in and day out. These groups should be ashamed for trying to demonize us, dehumanize us and for attempting to turn public sentiment against us.”
You can read the rest of the piece via the below link:
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/sep/10/in-defense-of-the-border-patrol/
Tuesday, September 10, 2019
A Look At The Pentagon 9/11 Memorial
As tomorrow is the anniversary of the horrific 9/11 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, readers might be interested in viewing the Pentagon 911 Memorial.
On Sept. 11, 2001, American Airlines Flight 77 was hijacked and crashed into the Pentagon, killing all 64 people on the plane and 125 people in the Pentagon. The Pentagon Memorial is the first national memorial dedicated to honoring the 184 people whose lives were lost at the Pentagon that day, their families, and all those who sacrifice so that we may live in freedom.
The
Pentagon Memorial captures a specific moment in time - 9:37 a.m. on Sept. 11,
2001, when 184 souls were lost. The $22 million memorial sits on two acres of
land right outside where the jetliner struck the building.
There are 184 memorial benches dedicated to each of the victims, and they’re organized in a timeline of their ages, from the youngest victim, 3-year-old Dana Falkenberg, to the oldest, 71-year-old John Yamnicky.
You can read more about the memorial and view photos and videos via the below link:
https://www.defense.gov/Experience/Pentagon-Memorial/source/GovDelivery/
There are 184 memorial benches dedicated to each of the victims, and they’re organized in a timeline of their ages, from the youngest victim, 3-year-old Dana Falkenberg, to the oldest, 71-year-old John Yamnicky.
You can read more about the memorial and view photos and videos via the below link:
https://www.defense.gov/Experience/Pentagon-Memorial/source/GovDelivery/
You
can also read my Counterterrorism magazine piece on the attack on the Pentagon
via the below link:
www.pauldavisoncrime.com/2012/09/a-look-back-at-911-attack-on-pentagon.html
www.pauldavisoncrime.com/2012/09/a-look-back-at-911-attack-on-pentagon.html
Sunday, September 8, 2019
A Little Humor: A Stingy Man
A stingy man worked all his life and had saved all of his money.
He was a real miser when it came to his money.
He loved money more than just about anything, and just before he died, he said to his wife, “Now listen, when I die I want you to take all my money and place it in the casket with me. I want to take all my money to the afterlife.”
So he got his wife to promise him with all her heart that when he died, she would put all the money in the casket with him.
The day he died, while he was stretched out in the casket, the wife was sitting there in black next to their best friend.
When they finished the ceremony, just before the undertakers got ready to close the casket, the wife said, “Wait a minute!”
She had a shoebox with her. She came over with the box and placed it in the casket. Then the undertakers locked the casket and rolled it away.
Her friend said, “I hope you weren’t crazy enough to put all that money in there with that stingy old man.”
She said, “Yes, I promised. I’m a good Christian, I can’t lie. I promised him that I was going to put that money in that casket with him.”
“You mean to tell me you put every cent of his money in the casket with him?”
“I sure did,” said the wife. “I got it all together, put it into my account and I wrote him a check.”
Note: The above photo is of the late, great comedian Jack Benny, who portrayed a stingy man in his act.
Labels:
A Little Humor,
A Stingy Man,
Jack Benny,
jokes
Friday, September 6, 2019
Defense Contractor Sentenced To Three Years In Prison For Conspiracy To Defraud U.S. Department Of Defense, Conspiracy To Violate Arms Export Control Act, And Income Tax Evasion
The U.S. Justice
Department released the below information:
The owner of two
defense contracting firms was sentenced to 36 months in prison for providing
non-conforming parts for military equipment, illegally sharing sensitive
technical information and evading income taxes Assistant Attorney General John
Demers and U.S. Attorney Craig Carpenito announced today.
Roger Sobrado, 49, of
Marlton, New Jersey, previously pleaded guilty before U.S. District Judge Noel
L. Hillman to an information charging him with one count each of conspiracy to
commit wire fraud, conspiracy to violate the Arms Export Control Act, and
income tax evasion. Judge Hillman imposed the sentence on Sept. 4, 2019, in
Camden federal court.
According to documents
filed in this case and statements made in court:
Sobrado was the owner
of two companies: Tico Manufacturing Inc. (TICO), a purported manufacturing
company, and Military and Commercial Spares Inc. (MCS), a defense contracting
company, both in Berlin Township, New Jersey.
Sobrado admitted that
between January 2011 and December 2015, MCS obtained contracts with the U.S.
Department of Defense (DoD) by falsely claiming that the military parts it
contracted to provide would be exactly as described and provided by authorized
manufacturers. The DoD contracts specified that the parts were critical application
items for military equipment, including fighter jets and helicopters. Sobrado
recruited various family members to participate in the scheme by establishing
companies that contracted with the DoD. Those companies also obtained
contracts with the DoD by falsely claiming that the military parts they
contracted to provide would be the exact product described and would be
provided by authorized manufacturers. In fact, Sobrado used TICO to contract
with local manufacturers to supply non-conforming parts to MCS and his family
members’ companies at a significantly reduced cost. The non-conforming parts
supplied by Sobrado were shipped from New Jersey to various DoD locations
around the country.
DoD paid Sobrado and
his family members’ companies for the non-conforming parts. The family members
then paid Sobrado for the non-conforming parts. Sobrado admitted that he
deposited some of his business receipts into his personal bank account and that
he paid for personal items from his business account without telling his
accountant. For tax years 2011 through 2014, Sobrado reported a total taxable
income of $1,608,372. He failed to report additional income of $1,182,405,
which caused a loss to the United States of $509,962.
Sobrado also admitted
that in August 2005 and in November 2010 he submitted to the DoD a fraudulent
application for access to export controlled drawings and technical data on
behalf of a family member’s company. Sobrado acknowledged that access to the
controlled drawings and technical data was limited to citizens of the United
States and to those lawfully in the United States. Sobrado said he submitted
the application because his family member told him that he needed access to
drawings and that he could not get them because he was not a U.S. citizen.
Sobrado agreed that on
July 28, 2011, and at various times between January 2013 and November 2015, the
family member, who is illegally in the United States, accessed or downloaded
hundreds of drawings that were sensitive in nature and that required special
access.
In addition to the
prison term, Judge Hillman sentenced Sobrado to three years of supervised
release and ordered him to pay $8,043,977 in restitution.
Assistant Attorney
General Demers and U.S. Attorney Carpenito credited special agents of the U.S.
Department of Defense, Defense Criminal Investigative Service Northeast Field
Office, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Leigh-Alistair Barzey;
special agents of the Department of Homeland Security, Homeland Security
Investigations, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Brian Michael;
special agents of IRS - Criminal Investigation, under the direction of Special
Agent in Charge John R. Tafur; special agents of the Social Security
Administration, Office of Inspector General, under the direction of Special
Agent in Charge John S. Grasso; and special agents of the U.S. Attorney’s
Office with the investigation leading to today’s sentencing.
The government is
represented by Senior Trial Counsel Jason M. Richardson of the U.S. Attorney’s
Office Criminal Division in Camden and Trial Attorney David Recker of the
Justice Department’s National Security Division.
Thursday, September 5, 2019
My Washington Times Review Of 'The Sentence Is Death'
The Washington Times published my review of Anthony Horowitz’s The Sentence Is Death.
In Anthony Horowitz’s previous novel, “The Word Is Murder,” readers were introduced to a character named Anthony Horowitz.
The fictional Anthony Horowitz shares the British writer’s background as a screenwriter and novelist who has written the Alex Rider mystery series for children, several British TV mystery series, including “Foyle’s War” (a favorite of mine), and two James Bond continuation novels and two Sherlock Holmes continuation novels.
In “The Word Is Murder” the fictional Anthony Horowitz acted as a modern-day Watson to a modern-day Holmes, a former Scotland Yard detective-turned private detective named Daniel Hawthorne, a brilliant, unconventional and immensely unlikable investigator.
Like Doctor John Watson, who was Sherlock Holmes’ assistant and biographer, fictional Anthony Horowitz became a somewhat reluctant chronicler and assistant to Daniel Hawthorne when he agreed to write a biography of the detective.
In “The Sentence Is Death,” Mr. Horowitz once again follows the detective as he investigates another unusual murder in London.
The novel opens with Anthony Horowitz on the set of “Foyle’s War” as the TV mystery series is filming on a London Street. This season of the program was set in 1947 and Mr. Horowitz explains to the readers the difficulties of filming a period piece on the streets of London.
“Shooting in London is always a horrible business, prohibitively expensive and fraught with difficulties. It often seems that the entire city is deliberately doing everything in its power to stop the cameras turning. Planes will fly overhead. Pneumatic drills and car alarms will burst into angry life. Police cars and ambulances will race past with their sirens blaring,” writes Mr. Horowitz.
Despite these difficulties, the TV crew was filming when a 21st century taxi rolled onto the set with a Justin Timberlake song blasting from the vehicle. Cut!
A man stepped out of the taxi, seemingly unconcerned by the crowd of people around him, many of whom where in period dress.
“He had a sort of cheerful self-confidence that was actually quite cold-blooded, utterly focused on his own needs at the expense of everyone else’s. He was not tall or well built but he gave the impression that, by whatever means necessary, he would never lose a fight. His hair, somewhere between brown and gray, was cut very short, particularly around the ears. His eyes, a darker brown, gazed innocently out of a pale, slightly unhealthy face. This was not someone who spent a lot of time in the sun,” Mr. Horowitz writes. “He was dressed in a dark suit, a white shirt and a narrow tie, clothes that might have been deliberately chosen to say nothing about him. His shoes were brightly polished. As he moved forward, he was already searching for me and I had to ask myself — how had he even known I was here?”
The man called out to Anthony Horowitz and the director asked the writer if he knew the man.
“Yes, I admitted. His name is Daniel Hawthorne, He’s a detective.”
You can read the rest of the review via the below link:
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/sep/4/book-review-sentence-death/
Tuesday, September 3, 2019
My Washington Times Piece On How California Law Enforcement Just Got More Dangerous
The Washington Times published my piece on how California law enforcement just became more dangerous.
Many years ago, when I was a crime reporter for a Philadelphia weekly newspaper, I attended the Philadelphia Police Department’s pilot session of the Civilian Police Academy and wrote an 11-part series on police training and operations.
Like actual police recruits, the civilian “recruits,” a collection of lawyers, clergy, community leaders and others, took a turn at the FireArms Training Simulator (FATS). The simulator put a stand-alone weapon in the recruits’ hand that interacted with a large-screen video scenario. One scenario had a man rush by the recruit, failing to heed the recruit’s order to stop. Following immediately, another man rushed out of the door with a handgun raised in the air. He stopped and said the first man had just robbed his store.
Afterward, the sergeant asked me why I didn’t fire at the two men and I replied that the first man posed no threat as he rushed by, and the second man posed no threat as he had his gun pointed up in the air.
“Good,” the sergeant said. “That sweet, elderly woman before you “smoked” ’em both.”
FATS training is useful, then and now, as it helps to prepare the officer for scenarios he or she may encounter on the street when a split-second decision may mean life or death for them and others.
Making split-second decisions on the street just got somewhat harder for police officers in California with the passing of AB 392, which California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law on Aug. 19.
The measure would prohibit officers from using deadly force unless it is “necessary” to defend against an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury to officers or bystanders. The previous standard allowed officers to use deadly force if they had “reasonable” fear they or others are in imminent danger. Police critics believe that the previous standard made it highly unlikely that officers who use deadly force could be charged with murder and unlikely that juries would convict them.
You can read the rest of the piece via the below link:
Sunday, September 1, 2019
My Washington Times Review of Ben Macintyre's 'The Spy And The Traitor'
The Washington Times published my review of Ben Macintyre’s The Spy and the Traitor: The Greatest Espionage Story of the Cold War.
John le Carre, the author of the classic spy thrillers “Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy” and “The Spy Who Came in From the Cold,” called Ben Macintyre’s book “The best true spy story I have ever read.”
Now out in paperback, Mr. Macintyre’s “The Spy and the Traitor: The Greatest Espionage Story of the Cold War” is the true story of Oleg Gordievsky, a KGB colonel who spied for the British and later defected to the United Kingdom in 1985.
“Oleg Gordievsky was born into the KGB: Shaped by it, loved by it, twisted, damaged, and very nearly destroyed by it. The Soviet spy service was in his heart and in his blood. His father worked for the intelligence service all his life, and wore his KGB uniform every day, including weekends. The Gordievskys lived amid the spy fraternity in a designated apartment block, ate special food reserved for officers, and spent their free time socializing with other spy families. Gordievsky was a child of the KGB,” Mr. Macintyre writes in the beginning of the book.
The author notes that the KGB — the Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnnosti, or Committee for State Security — was the most complex and far-reaching intelligence agency ever created. The KGB had the role of both foreign and domestic intelligence gathering, as well as internal security enforcement and state police. The KGB controlled every aspect of life in the Soviet Union.
Gordievsky moved up the chain in the KGB to become the “rezident,” the senior KGB intelligence officer in London, working out of the Soviet embassy. For more than 10 years he was also working as a double agent for the British.
As Mr. Macintyre points out in his outstanding book, Gordievsky became disillusioned with Soviet communism while posted in Copenhagen. The Soviet police state paled in comparison to the freedom of the West. His disillusionment became total after the Soviets invaded Czechoslovakia in 1968 and he decided to spy for the British.
His intelligence was so valuable that British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and President Ronald Reagan were given briefings on Gordievsky’s insights into the KGB and Soviet political leadership. The CIA was not told who the Brit spy was, so they launched an investigation to learn who the valuable British asset was.
You can read the rest of the review via the below link:
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/aug/30/book-review-spy-and-traitor/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






