Thursday, January 10, 2019

This Map Shows Where In The World The U.S. Military Is Combatting Terrorism


Smithsonianmag.com offers a map of the places in the world where the U.S. Military is engaging in counterterrorism operations.

Less than a month after the September 11 terrorist attacks on the United States, U.S. troops—with support from British, Canadian, French, German and Australian forces—invaded Afghanistan to fight Al Qaeda and the Taliban. More than 17 years later, the Global War on Terrorism initiated by President George W. Bush is truly global, with Americans actively engaged in countering terrorism in 80 nations on six continents.

This map is the most comprehensive depiction in civilian circles of U.S. military and government antiterrorist actions overseas in the past two years. To develop it, my colleagues and I at Brown University’s Costs of War Project at the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, along with Smithsonian magazine, combed through U.S. and foreign government sources, published and unpublished reports, military websites and geographical databases; we contacted foreign embassies in the U.S. and the military’s United States Africa Command; and we conducted interviews with journalists, academics and others. We found that, contrary to what most Americans believe, the war on terror is not winding down—it has spread to more than 40 percent of the world’s countries. The war isn’t being waged by the military alone, which has spent $1.9 trillion fighting terrorism since 2001. The State Department has spent $127 billion in the last 17 years to train police, military and border patrol agents in many countries and to develop antiterrorism education programs, among other activities.

You can read the rest of the piece via the below link:


Note: You can click on the map to enlarge.

Wednesday, January 9, 2019

2019 National Law Enforcement Appreciation Day


Philadelphia Police: Be On The Lookout For DeJuan Robinson In South Philadelphia

The Philadelphia Police released the above photo of Dejuan Robinson and the below warning:

*URGENT* This male is a person of interest for multiple homicides in the state of Delaware. 5'6" 160lbs.. Medium complexion with light beard. Male was wearing a white thermal shirt which he may have discarded and blue jeans. **He is believed to be in South Philadelphia in the area of Broad and Oregon, he and is armed and dangerous**DO NOT APPROACH - call 9-11 immediately!  

Tuesday, January 8, 2019

Why A Border Wall Matters


Republican Arizona Congressman Andy Biggs offers a piece on why we need a border wall in the Washington Times.

I was recently expressing my conviction that America needs a border wall to a friend and colleague from across the political aisle. He was convinced that we don’t need a wall, but rather that we need “border security.” Everyone has a pretty good idea what a border wall might be, but we’re all a bit fuzzy on what “border security” looks like.

Last week, I spent several hours talking to ranchers and residents who live along the border. Each one forcefully argued in favor of a border wall.

On one of my trips to the border, I asked my escorts, a couple of border patrol agents, if they thought we needed a border wall. They emphasized to me their support for a wall. I mentioned using more drones, manned aerial vehicles, cameras and ground sensors. They informed me, in no uncertain terms, that the Border Patrol has plenty of technology — lots of drones, cameras, sensors, etc. — and that a wall is necessary if we really want “border security.”

Remember, President Trump didn’t run on “border security.” He ran on building a wall and enforcing our laws.

Drones, cameras, sensors and other technology do not provide an impediment to illegal entry into the United States. Where we have these tools available, our agents can often spot the illegal crossers but do little about interdicting them. On the other hand, one must plan on how to cope with the physical barricade of a wall. 

You can read the rest of the piece via the below link: 

Monday, January 7, 2019

The U.S. Central Command Statement On Death Of USS Cole Bombing Operative


The U.S. Navy News Service reports that Jamal al-Badawi, a terrorist involved in the attack on the USS Cole in 2000, was killed in Yemen.

(NNS) -- U.S. Central Command spokesman Capt. Bill Urban released the following statement Jan. 6 on the death of Jamal al-Badawi:

“U.S. Central Command has confirmed that Jamal al-Badawi was killed in a precision strike in Marib governate [Yemen] on Jan. 1.

“Jamal al-Badawi was a legacy al Qaeda operative in Yemen involved in the USS Cole bombing. U.S. forces confirmed the results of the strike following a deliberate assessment process.

“Jamal al-Badawi was indicted by a federal grand jury in 2003, charged with 50 counts of various terrorism offenses, including murder of U.S. nationals and murder of U.S. military personnel; was wanted by the U.S. for his role in the Oct. 12, 2000, terrorist attack against USS Cole; and was also charged with attempting with co-conspirators to attack a U.S. Navy vessel in January 2000.”


USS Cole (DDG 67) was attacked during a brief refueling stop in the harbor of Aden, Yemen. The suicide terrorist attack killed 17 members of the ship's crew, wounded 39 others and seriously damaged the ship. 

After 14 months of upgrades and repairs, the Arleigh Burke-class – "Determined Warrior” – returned to the fleet, departing Pascagoula, Mississippi, April 19, 2002. 


You can also read my Counterterrorism magazine interview with the commanding officer of the USS Cole during the attack via the below link:



Friday, January 4, 2019

Driver Charged In Head-On Crash That Killed 3 In South Philadelphia


Jeff Cole at Fox 29 in Philadelphia reports that the driver who killed three people and injured one is being charged with homicide.

SOUTH PHILADELPHIA (WTXF) - The driver involved in a crash that left three people dead and another critically injured in South Philadelphia on Wednesday is now facing charges.

Keith Campbell, 29, has been charged with three counts of homicide by vehicle along with other related charges. Sources tell FOX 29’s Jeff Cole more charges could be filed.

FOX 29 has learned the police force of tiny Newport, Delaware—South of Wilmington—is investigating the events leading up to the fatal crash. Delaware State Police tell FOX 29 it “assisted Newport with an attempted vehicle stop” in the hours before the collision.

Three people are dead and two people are critically injured following a head-on crash in South Philadelphia.

State Police directed FOX 29 to Newport police where Corporal John Mitchell said there is “an on-going investigation” and it is working with Philadelphia police accident investigators on the case.

"There was no one else in the vehicle, so supposition is he stabbed himself," Philadelphia Police

 Captain Mark Overwise said.

Police say Campbell was suffering from multiple stab wounds as he drove down the 600 block of Packer Avenue just before 2 a.m. Wednesday morning when he struck an Acura SUV head on.

Three of the Acura's four passengers — identified as 36-year-old Joseph Ferry of South Philadelphia, 35-year-old Kelly Wiseley of Glenolden, and 31-year-old Dennis Palandro of Morton — were killed.  Ferry and Wiseley just got engaged over the holidays.

You can read the rest of the piece via the below link:


Note: The father of the survivor of the crash is my sister-in-law’s cousin. I’ve known the family for most of my life. My heart goes out to them.

Thursday, January 3, 2019

Presidents Of War


Joseph C. Goulden, a veteran journalist and author of Korea: The Untold Story of the War and Truth Is the First Casualty, on the Tonkin resolution, offers a good review in the Washington Times of Michael Beschloss’ Presidents Of War.

A distinguished historian who has written 10 outstanding books perhaps can be excused for a single outrageous sentence that leaves a reader shaking his head in disbelief.

Michael Beschloss makes just such a misstep in his otherwise magnificent account of how American presidents went to war over the centuries. He writes that the way the nation entered World War II “did so much to elevate [President] Roosevelt’s standing that it increased the temptation for later Presidents to elevate their reputation by seeking foreign conflict.”

Pardon my dissenting blink. As Washington correspondent for The Philadelphia Inquirer 1967-68, I witnessed Lyndon Johnson’s open agony on a daily basis as he fought a war that essentially destroyed his presidency. And I thought of the frustrations endured by President Truman by waging the Korean conflict into which he was abruptly thrust. Neither man felt that war “elevated” their reputations, to be sure.

That quibble aside, Mr. Beschloss offers fascinating insight about how presidents have dealt with what is surely their most demanding responsibility: That of asking Congress to put the nation into war.

The men who created the United States wisely decided that such a decision should not be left to the president alone. Memories of European wars commenced by unrestricted monarchs haunted the Founding Fathers. In their view, “war would be a last resort under the political system they had invented.”

You can read the rest of the review via the below link: