Showing posts with label Lt Colonel Ralph Peters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lt Colonel Ralph Peters. Show all posts

Saturday, November 4, 2017

Army Deserter Bergdahl Goes Free, But The Wounded Serve Life Sentences


Author and retired U.S. Army Lt Colonel Ralph Peters offers his take on the Army deserter Bergdahl in his New York Post column.

Attention, all troops peeved with your platoon sergeant, bored with your field rations, or who just want a little private time: It’s okay to desert your post in a combat zone. It’s fine for you to trigger the deaths and grave woundings of better men than you. A military judge just set a precedent: Deserters in wartime walk free.

You’ll probably get a book deal, too, and be portrayed as a hero in a big-budget film.

The US Army colonel and judge who decided Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl’s fate has some explaining to do. How is it that a confessed deserter, whose actions brought our Afghan campaign to a halt and led to the acknowledged wounding and alleged deaths of his comrades, can walk out of a military courtroom a free man? With not one day of prison time? How is that possible?

You can read the rest of the column via the below link:

Saturday, July 15, 2017

No One Ever Truly Retires From Russian Intelligence


Retired Lt Colonel Ralph Peters, who served a U.S. Army intelligence officer, offers his take in his column at the New York Post on the so-called “retired” Russian intelligence officer who attended a meeting with President Trump’s son 

Of all the creatures rumored to roam the earth, we can be certain that three do not exist: unicorns, fire-breathing dragons and “former” Russian intelligence agents. Moscow’s security services are like the mob: Once you’re in, you’re in for life. Whether the “former” spy or hit man is doing billion-dollar deals through Cypriot banks or running a tanning parlor in Murmansk, when the capo di capo calls, the game’s back on.

We can’t take the measure of Russians by applying American rules. Here, when you leave an intelligence agency, you leave your access and duties completely behind you (unless you go to work for a Beltway Bandit, in which case there’s a record of your employment). When I retired from US Army Military Intelligence, I was “read off” and could not be tapped for classified work any longer, unless I were formally rehired and processed for a renewed security clearance.

We also have robust firewalls between intelligence agencies, the rest of government, the private sector, the media, NGOs and so forth. In Russia, there are no firewalls. You can be a businessman, a propagandist, a human-rights lawyer (I love that one) and a spy simultaneously. You can be a billionaire cruising the Greek islands on your mega-yacht, but if Putin’s dogsbody rings your cell with a task, vacation’s over.

Russia is, in the end, Putin Incorporated.


But when we know that a Russian has formally worked as a “former counterintelligence agent” — as we learned Friday about an additional person present at the now-famous meeting last year between Trump family members and Russians promising dirt on Mrs. Clinton — we can mentally drop that word “former.”

And to claim that a meeting with the Russian equivalent of a mob lawyer and a “former” Russian counterintelligence officer is business-as-usual for any American political campaign is utterly untrue.

(Yes, the Clintons have had more ugly connections than there are rats in Manhattan. But shabby as they are, the Clintons never sought campaign collusion with Russian intelligence agents. The Clintons prefer being bought over being fooled.)

There are no good guys on this political landscape. But as we go forward, let’s remember who the real bad guys are: the Russians. Not the Ukrainians, who are fighting for democracy and survival while under attack by Putin. Not journalists, who are doing their work as foreseen by the First Amendment. And certainly not the special counsel, who embodies our core belief in justice for all.


The bad guys are the Russians, who have tried, with unprecedented audacity, immense resources and breathtaking cynicism, to subvert the fundamental tool of our self-government, our elections.

And a Russian spy once means a Russian spy forever.

You can read the rest of the column via the below link:


Note: The top photo is of Putin as a KGB officer. The middle photo is of Ralph Peters and the last photo is of Putin today.

Tuesday, February 14, 2017

Ralph Peters: Lt. General Michael Flynn's Dangerous Gamble With US National Security


Ralph Peters offers his take on the resignation of retired Lt. General Michael Flynn in his column in the New York Post.

Outgoing National Security Adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, who resigned Monday night, made one, possibly two, grave mistakes. First, he secretly discussed lifting sanctions during illicit phone calls with Russia’s ambassador. Second, he may have lied to Vice President Mike Pence about his activities.
That second charge, if true, alone was a firing offense. But the first charge is more alarming.
Those of us who hold conservative views on national security howled when President Obama got caught on a hot mic in 2012 promising Russia’s then-President Dmitry Medvedev a strategic ice cream cone for Vladimir Putin. That was an act of betrayal, meant to be concealed from American voters.
Now some pundits on the right hypocritically dismiss Flynn’s back-channel valentines to Moscow as no big deal. But the allegations cut to the core of national security: A not-yet-in-office presidential adviser undermined the incumbent administration and evaded the will of Congress by acting surreptitiously to favor a hostile power.
You can read the rest of the piece via the below link:

http://nypost.com/2017/02/13/the-one-way-national-security-adviser-mike-flynn-can-keep-his-job/

Friday, January 6, 2017

Ralph Peters: Why Trump Is Wrong to Target The U.S. Intelligence Community


Ralph Peters (seen in the above photo), a retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel and intelligence officer, offers his view of the U.S. intelligence community in his column at the New York Post.

Thursday’s Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on cyber-warfare threats — particularly those from Russia — was a welcome moment for grown-ups. Frank, honest and bipartisan, the consensus from our legislators and our intelligence-community leadership was that we face multiple grave and growing dangers, but the most-immediate and only existential threat comes from Vladimir Putin’s Russia.
And yes, the Russians did attack our elections with cyber-weapons and information warfare. All our intelligence agencies agree. Which is rare.
Republican or Democrat, the senators praised the patriotism and accomplishments of those who serve in our intelligence agencies. That was welcome, too, given the political fashion of the moment to denigrate our intelligence professionals while turning backflips to excuse Putin’s strategic subversion and condone the actions of an America-hating alleged rapist, Julian Assange.
You can read the rest of the column via the below link:

http://nypost.com/2017/01/05/why-trump-is-wrong-to-target-the-us-intelligence-community/

Sunday, December 11, 2016

Ralph Peters: Vladimir Putin Will Always Be America's Enemy


Ralph Peters, a retired U.S. Army Lt Colonel and author, offers his take on Russia's Vladimir Putin in a column in the New York Post.

Vladimir Putin is our enemy. Not because we want him to be, but because resentment and hatred of the United States is central to his being. Russia’s president yearns to do us harm.
He blames us for the Soviet Union’s self-wrought collapse. He blames us for Russian stagnation. He blames us for the derelict lot of his drunken, diseased country. And he wants revenge.
Putin has five strategic goals: He wants international sanctions lifted, Europe divided and NATO destroyed. He seeks to restore the empire of the czars. And he wants to humiliate the United States.
You can read the rest of the piece via the below link:

http://nypost.com/2016/12/11/vladimir-putin-will-always-be-americas-enemy/


You can also read an earlier post via the below link:

http://www.pauldavisoncrime.com/2012/02/vladimir-putin-godfather-of-mafia-clan.html

Friday, December 2, 2016

Ralph Peters: What Our Nation Would Get With General Mattis As Defense Secretary


Retired U.S. Army Lt Colonel and author Ralph Peters offers his take on retired Marine General James Mattis (seen in the above DoD photo), who may become the next Secretary of Defense.

I’m lucky enough to know General James Mattis slightly. Just well enough to trust him unreservedly with our military and our nation’s security.
The president-elect could not choose a better man to be our next Secretary of Defense. Not just because Mattis is a battle-hardened Marine with a remarkable combat record. And not just because he has a mind of remarkable clarity and is, without question, the best-read general of his generation.
I trust Jim Mattis because he’s a man of character, that most un-Washingtonian quality. His public image is of one rough-and-tough Marine, but the man I’ve encountered is, above all, one of integrity. His code of honor is so out of fashion that one has to reach back to a Victorian vocabulary:  He has a noble spirit.
And he’s a genuine patriot, not a shouter with his eye on the next chance. He will do what’s right, not what’s expedient.  And he will never go along with anything he believes might harm our country.
In addition to plenty of dirty-boots experience in the Middle East and a deep knowledge of history—that most underrated study—Jim Mattis has another great qualification to be SecDef: He wasn’t looking for a job. He was happy in retirement, studying, helping his fellow Marines, and contributing thoughtfully to our national security behind the scenes.
You can read the rest of the piece via the below link:

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/12/01/ralph-peters-what-our-nation-would-get-with-gen-mattis-as-defense-secretary.html?cmpid=NL_opinion     

Sunday, December 13, 2015

Ralph Peters Calls Obama A ‘Total Pussy’ On Live Television


Retired Lt Colonel Ralph Peters, an author and Fox News "talking head," was suspended by Fox for two weeks for calling President Obama "a total pussy."

This is the view of most of the current and former military people I've talked to over the years of the Obama administration.

David Rutz at freebeacon.com offers a piece on the broadcast.

Retired U.S. Army Lt. Col. Ralph Peters called President Obama “a total pussy” during a live interview Monday for what he views as his impotent response to the threat of Islamic extremist terrorism.
Peters, a Fox News military analyst, appeared on Stuart Varney’s Fox Business program to respond to Obama’s Sunday night Oval Office address on the threat of terrorism, a speech that was widely panned. Peters, a fierce critic of Obama’s national security policies, was visibly angry as he blasted the speech.
You can read the rest of the piece via the below link:

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/ralph-peters-calls-obama-a-total-pussy-on-live-television/